Page 18 - AAA January / February 2023 Latest Magazine | GBP
P. 18

and 1,500  fewer  controllers  on board,  a  at ways that may meaningfully address the challenges of ATCO
        number that has declined for at least the past  training.
        11 years.”

                                                     Inter-Operability of ATC Systems
        Can ATCO Mobility be Part of                 Technological advances have enabled inter-operability of ATC
        The Solution?                                systems, and therefore the ability to conduct CNS services at
        Eurocontrol sees remote air traffic control as   longer ranges, including in airspaces outside the State. The
        a solution to the unpredictable demand within   primary applications today are delegations of small pieces of
        European airspace. Traditionally, the term   typically contiguous airspace, either on a permanent basis or
        ATCO mobility has had a strong geographic    contingent on specific circumstances (such as the failure of sys-
        association, meaning that mobility implied a   tems in a neighbouring state).
        physical relocation of an ATCO from one Area
        Control Centre (ACC) or ATS unit to another,
        or less frequently, one State to another.    Eurocontrol says these arrangements are subject to binding
                                                     State agreements and can be fraught with issues of liability and
        The problem lies in that the demand for      application of national legislation. Nonetheless, it is significant
        ATCOs can rapidly change throughout the      that inter-operability has opened up possibilities to progress from
        course of the week or even the day. A more   delegation of air traffic services for the purposes of contingency,
        responsive solution than physically relocating   to the sharing of the provision of the air traffic services (and
        ATCOs would clearly be beneficial.
                                                     importantly, the sharing of ATCO resources) of larger portions
        Toward this end, Eurocontrol introduced      of airspaces on a routine basis.
        remote or cross-border operations, where
        ATCOs do not physically move but rather con-
        trol airspace outside that normally controlled   It is this notion of ATCO mobility (i.e. cross-border operations) that
        by their ACC – potentially in another State. In   has attracted the most attention as a potential way to resolve
        this case, qualified ATCOs may be assigned to   capacity shortfalls and ATCO staff shortages. “Scalability is an
        the airspaces and sectors where the demand   attractive feature of this approach as it gives flexibility to assign
        is greatest, irrespective of national boundar-  controllers to the sectors where the need is the greatest at any
        ies, with potentially attractive gains in terms   given moment, irrespective of the national boundary or ACC in
        of flexibility and scalability.              which the controller is located.
        “However,  a  significant  challenge  to  this
        approach is the willingness of States to enter
        into agreements that enable the delegation   “If it is possible for two ANSPs to share the air traffic manage-
        of Air Traffic Services (ATS) in their sovereign   ment of an airspace that covers the common boundary of two
        airspace, taking into account national security   States, then technically it should be possible for this idea to be
        issues,” Eurocontrol says.                   expanded to include controllers in one State/ANSP controlling
                                                     airspace in another State/ANSP. This could happen as a routine
        By implementing cross-border ATC provision,   agreement, or when one ANSP does not have enough ATCOs to
        European airspace will become more dynamic   enable the full capacity of their airspace to be used at any given
        to the seemingly unpredictable demand for air   time,” Eurocontrol says.
        traffic control. A given sector may not have
        much air traffic and those ATCOs could be uti-
        lized more efficiently by reassigning them to
        busier airspace. In practice, this would reduce
        delay times and allow for a more economically
        efficient system.

        For both types of ATCO mobility, a significant
        issue is the time taken to ‘convert’ (i.e. obtain
        a new rating endorsement) from one sector
        group to a new sector group. This is usually
        considerably longer than the time taken for
        a pilot to convert from one aircraft type to
        another.
        A Think Paper by Eurocontrol addresses why
        ATCO conversion training is challenging and,
        in complex airspaces, takes so long. It looks
        18 | JANUARY - FEBRUARY 2023                                                       WWW.GBP.COM.SG/AAA
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23